Yesterday’s free porn movies will probably never be seen again.
That’s because they’re copyrighted by Hollywood studios, so you can’t get them for free online.
So, why not just pay for them yourself?
A few years ago, I wrote a blog post explaining why that was a bad idea.
Today, I’m going to explain why that’s also a good idea.
But first, a bit of history.
Back in 2009, the UK Government announced it was ending copyright protections for the film and television industry.
It’s been a bit over a decade since then, but the UK still has a long way to go.
But the Government’s decision has been hailed by a few prominent figures in the entertainment industry.
“It’s a huge step forward for the UK, and one that I believe is a significant step forward in our international competitiveness,” said Hollywood producer Tom Hooper.
It wasn’t just Hollywood who thought that.
The British Film Institute, the government body that represents the country’s major film studios, also agreed.
“The UK’s decision to extend the copyright term of movies is a welcome step towards making Britain the global hub for film and TV,” said its president, Tim Moore.
The UK’s Film Industry Federation (FIF), which represents the British film industry, also applauded the decision.
“We welcome the decision by the Government to extend copyright protection for film films to a new copyright term in 2021, which is a very welcome step forward,” said FIF chief executive James Harding.
And this isn’t just any copyright extension, either.
The Film Industry Act 2010 is the first copyright extension law in the world.
It makes it so that films made after January 1st, 2021, can be published for free to the public.
And it allows movies to be used in films released after 2021 as well.
So why do we need an extension to the copyright protection?
Well, copyright holders want the movies they make to stay in the public domain, and they want them to stay free.
That means that you can only see and buy their films if you pay for it.
The problem is that there are a few big studios that don’t want to pay for their films to be made available for free, either because they make the films themselves, or because they buy them from big studios.
These studios also don’t like it when they make movies that are copyrighted by their own studios.
They want to make the movies available for anyone to see.
So the copyright holders have to extend it, and now they have the option to do so.
But before they do, they need to make sure that the movies are safe for people to watch.
The Copyright Amendment Act 2011 gives the copyright owners the power to change the term of protection for their copyrighted material.
So they can make the terms longer or shorter.
They can also make sure their copyright doesn’t expire and become invalid if they change them.
The copyright holders also have to make certain that the films are safe.
They don’t have to give them away, but they can’t make it easier to access the movies.
So for example, in 2017, the copyright holder Universal Studios said it would remove the copyright from The Hurt Locker (which Universal has also made available on the internet for free) if it didn’t have a copyright extension.
The film industry’s lobby group the Film Industry Association (FIA) said that Universal was making it easier for viewers to access copyrighted material on the web.
So in 2017 it changed its copyright terms and made it harder for people who paid for the movies to see them for themselves.
This was a big problem for the copyright industry.
But as the copyright extension went into effect, it made it easier and safer for people like me to watch the movies for free.
The extension was good for everyone in the film industry.
People like me got to watch my movies without worrying that they were being pirated.
People in the music and film industries got to enjoy the movies without having to pay to see the music or the film.
And people in the gaming industry got to see some of the movies we all loved to watch for free and without worrying about piracy.
But it’s a terrible solution for everyone involved.
Because the extensions themselves are bad for everyone.
First, they’re bad for the movie studios.
Because there’s no way to know whether a movie will be available for download when it goes online, and it’s also hard to tell whether the movie will make money once it’s made available online.
If the movies don’t make money, it’s hard to know what to do with the money that’s already made from the movies being available online for free (it’s unlikely the studios will ever make any money from the films being released on the Internet, anyway).
And since the studios aren’t able to tell us how much money they’ll make from movies being released online, they can also easily make money by reselling the movies that people are interested in.
And since people don’t get